I'm running the 5384 Beta 2 on that machine:
XP 2600+ running at 2200 MGHZ 1,25 GB DDR 400 Ram's 2-3-3-6 1T GeForce 5900 with 128 MB's
RAID 0 with 2 Seagate's on a Silicon Image 3112 Softcontroller (onboard)...
It runs very poor... It saves something on the discs the whole time, and that makes it very slow i guess....

Vista very slow
In article , Jonas says...
I'm running the 5384 Beta 2 on that machine:
XP 2600+ running at 2200 MGHZ 1,25 GB DDR 400 Ram's 2-3-3-6 1T GeForce 5900 with 128 MB's
RAID 0 with 2 Seagate's on a Silicon Image 3112 Softcontroller (onboard)...
It runs very poor... It saves something on the discs the whole time, and that makes it very slow i guess....
Give it a while..it eventually stops doing that. It's indexing the
contents and it also automatically defrags the drive. Mine seemed to do it all the time for the first couple of days but stopped once I'd got everything installed and left it alone for a while.
-- Conor Grumpy Old Man Same Shit, Different Day.
It's likely defragmenting with the very poorly made defrag program that barely works. It will stop eventually. It won't be the indexing of the computer, that only takes a couple minutes max. One other thing that you could try is changing the RAM configuration so that it runs in dual-channel, but that would only help if your motherboard supports dual channel. It gives a huge boost in the system rating for memory. ---------- Mark Dietz PROnetworks <http://www.pro-networks.org>
Jonas wrote:
I'm running the 5384 Beta 2 on that machine:
XP 2600+ running at 2200 MGHZ 1,25 GB DDR 400 Ram's 2-3-3-6 1T GeForce 5900 with 128 MB's
RAID 0 with 2 Seagate's on a Silicon Image 3112 Softcontroller (onboard)...
It runs very poor... It saves something on the discs the whole time, and that makes it very slow i guess....
In article , Mark Dietz says...
It's likely defragmenting with the very poorly made defrag program that barely works.
There is a 30 day trial of Diskeeper 10 Professional with Vista support available. It's FAR better than Windows defrag.
I bought Diskeeper 9 for XP and I think I'll probably buy 10 too at some point.
-- Conor Grumpy Old Man Same Shit, Different Day.
I am running Vista Beta 2 on a Gateway P4-2ghz computer with 768 megs of RAM and it runs quite fast. Almost as fast as Windows XP.
William
Jonas wrote:
I'm running the 5384 Beta 2 on that machine:
XP 2600+ running at 2200 MGHZ 1,25 GB DDR 400 Ram's 2-3-3-6 1T GeForce 5900 with 128 MB's
RAID 0 with 2 Seagate's on a Silicon Image 3112 Softcontroller (onboard)...
It runs very poor... It saves something on the discs the whole time, and that makes it very slow i guess....
Windows Vista
User login
Related topics
- Quake 4 post patching issue
- Stop treating .zip-files different
- Internet Explorer Home Page
- Vista beta 2 - running very choppy
- Webdav connection
- Windows Live Messenger & Vista
- Speech Recognition
- "Official" rumor mill sez Novemberfor Vista launch...
- Bluetooth #5
- Boot issues
- Alps touch pad
- Windows Photo Gallery tags problems
- New ribbon UI
- laying down images error?
- Any comments on Thurrott's recent article on Supersite?
- PowerISO Utility
- Windows Vista Beta 2 Queries
- bkf files
- Schwerwiegende Fehler
- windows cannot verify cd key
- Intel 915 and Aero
- Beta 2 x64 Fails to Install
- change MTU
- SLI on Vista
- SSL access INCREDIBLY slow
- Installing vista on 2000 computer
- HP Printers
- Bypass boot screen?
- Error in Media Center "IR Hardware not detected"
- Display Settings
- MS DVD Kit Vista Install -80070241 error
- Printers that work
- Dual Boot Problem - Misplaced boot sector
- Final VISTA release in DVD only or also on CD
- Protokollproblem with Check Disk (chkdsk)
- What bitrate is Urge music?